Cases teach principles

What courts have looked for

Case examples help explain evidence and legal principles. They do not decide another family's facts.

Banks v Goodfellow

The classic test for testamentary capacity. A person can have mental illness and still make a valid will if the illness does not affect the will decision.

Hughes v Pritchard [2022] EWCA Civ 386

Solicitor evidence and medical evidence both matter. The golden rule is good practice, not automatic proof.

Rea v Rea [2024] EWCA Civ 169

Undue influence requires strong evidence of coercion. Frailty, opportunity, and an unfair-looking result may not be enough.

Edwards v Edwards [2007] EWHC 1119 (Ch)

Fraudulent calumny: false poisonous stories about a natural beneficiary can help invalidate a will if the proof is strong.

Hawes v Burgess [2013] EWCA Civ 74

Suspicious circumstances and the solicitor's role can be important when knowledge, approval, and capacity are disputed.

Ilott v The Blue Cross [2017] UKSC 17

Family provision claims are not the same as proving a will invalid.