Banks v Goodfellow
The classic test for testamentary capacity. A person can have mental illness and still make a valid will if the illness does not affect the will decision.
Cases teach principles
Case examples help explain evidence and legal principles. They do not decide another family's facts.
The classic test for testamentary capacity. A person can have mental illness and still make a valid will if the illness does not affect the will decision.
Solicitor evidence and medical evidence both matter. The golden rule is good practice, not automatic proof.
Undue influence requires strong evidence of coercion. Frailty, opportunity, and an unfair-looking result may not be enough.
Fraudulent calumny: false poisonous stories about a natural beneficiary can help invalidate a will if the proof is strong.
Suspicious circumstances and the solicitor's role can be important when knowledge, approval, and capacity are disputed.
Family provision claims are not the same as proving a will invalid.